This post was initially inspired by a comment I've made on Bu Jassem's blog. My dear friend Bu Jassem (or Buj, or Buj Al Arab) is an Emirati structural engineer, who works for a London based engineering consultancy.
His post was about a stage in construction called
topping-out, which is a mile-stone in constrution that signifies the completion of the structure. The only different aspect of the topping-out Bu Jassem was refering to, is that it was for a building that will serve as a QH for his own office, and that parts of the building are of his own design.
He has also decided to take on architects in the process. And here I quote :)) :
Dubai Jazz.. sho rayak? is this like your kind of work? Do you think the Architect did a good job? I won't tell you their name, as you'll probably know them. The facade is meant to be really adaptive and cool. Mind you, you don't see the quality of the architecture at topping-out stage usually (except for bridges, which don't really need architects, no?).So here goes my reply to Bu Jassem...
Well then let me start the (architect versus structural engineer) chagrin! it is fair to say that structural engineers in general have bigger responsibility than architects, for that they are accountable for the safety of the structure as long as it supposed to live. While architects, even when they come up with the most eyesore designs, they get a little bit of reproach, and then when everybody is used to the de-facto building, the fuss tappers off and after a while it is finished. It is not always that easy, but most often than not, an architectural blunder can be fixed, modified, and even argued for! (mind you, architecture, like the taste for beauty, is very subjective matter...)
It is also fair to say that it is a bit easier for a structural engineer to become prominent and to go places with his career, because at the end of the day, it is a matter of science acquisition, you get the knowledge, and then you apply it. The only luck related element is to get the chance to practice this knowledge in designing decent building. The kinds of challenges that fascinates structural engineers are entirely different than those that tickle the fancies of architects. A structural engineer might get a kick out of designing a retrofit or an addition to a building. In fact, in most of the retrofit/addition projects I worked upon, I've had structural engineers taking delight at cracking the nuts of such projects, while I, at the other hand, wouldn't really enjoy myself taking up such tasks...
Yes that's true, architects like to design brand new buildings!
Talking of construction, I had, thanks to my old boss, a very joyful time supervising the construction of a building which I've designed myself. It was indeed a golden opportunity for an architect as young as I was (27 years old). It is an explicable feeling of pride when you see the building you've designed yourself taking shape, and to watch the different parts and components getting assembled to create the ultimate vision. It would also be good to admit one's mistakes and oversights and learn from them.